Heh, I'm assuming you looked at my sig at the maximum extreme results. Yes that would be pretty amazing. If you are wondering why the gap is bigger for the 360 one, it's because I'm trying to imply there that the 360 could win or lose to the PS3. Honestly, the PS1 and PS2 were both amazing consoles, and so far are the only consoles to beat 100 million (minus the GB of course, but that's a portable and even that couldn't beat the PS2). I hope the PS3 does do well, because I don't think any company should have to go through what Sega went through. And I do agree with your sig about the 300 dollar PS3 turning this generation around, it's just I don't think Sony has the money to do that (which is something MS has over them). To me it looks like MS is just trying to outsell Sony at any cost while Sony is trying to make profit.
