Phrancheyez said:
Kasz216 said:
leo-j said:
Kasz216 said:
Not on the PS3 it wouldn't... on another system it has a shot. |
Whats the difference? If people want a FF VII remake, then they would just buy the system with the remake. Why do you think FF gamers got a playstation?
|
I got one for FF7. It was also much cheaper.
People aren't going to buy a PS3 for a remake.
Way too expensive.
If they aren't buying it for 13 they aren't going to buy it for 7.
Lots of casuals who bought FF7 have just outgrown gaming in 10 years anyway... or are we betting on the new crowd who's never even played the game?
|
Wrong and....wrong.
If I didn't have a PS3, a FFVII remake would make me buy one without even blinking. And I probably won't even try the FFXIII demo, not to mention it's multiplat. FFVII would be exclusive, and it wasn't a casual title to begin with.
Outgrown gaming? Are you aware that the average age of gamers in the U.S. is 35? By that number alone, it doesn't look like a whole lot of people ever outgrow gaming. I never will - hell, when I have kids, I'll be competing with them!
"Hey there Junior, you better do your homework and go practice some Resistance 4, because you know the rule - if you lose 4 nights in a row, you're washin my truck in the morning!"
|
Really. You think there were over 9 million hardcore users on the PS1.... and they all loved RPGs.
You guys can believe what you want... but a lot of people who played 10 years ago simply don't play today. One port of an old game isn't going to change that.
It's got nothing to do with a "Stigma" some people actually believe it or not just stop enjoying videogames. At some point you actually get bored with shit if you keep doing it over and over again unlesss you are a diehard fan...
and the majority of videogame users have always been casuals. The kind of people who would rather do a number of things then play videogames, but did so because they just had a large excess of time and money.
