Another Review of Bioshock: 9

[super_etecoon]

RolStoppable said:

stof said:

Legend11 said:

I don't really see how Zelda: OOT was so amazingly new and groundbreaking. Could you tell me what it introduced that games before it never had? Because I owned it, made it about 2/3 of the way through before getting bored and there was nothing in it that I would call groundbreaking. I found nothing new with the story or even the gameplay mechanics of the game, it had good atmosphere but so have many games that have come before it. I would give the nod though to Super Mario 64 since it did indeed help to push forward 3d platformers but I honestly don't see even one thing revolutionary in Zelda: OOT. And I suspect that nostalgia played a role in it being the most critically acclaimed game ever, if it had been named Bell: OOT with a different main bad guy, etc, does anyone honestly think it would be the most critically acclaimed game ever? I really doubt it.

Next time I get in an argument over whether or not the human sole exists, I can point to you as proof that it doesn't. Because you sir, have no soul!

Just look at yourself, Mr "I have little interest in Echoes". 

Well played, Rol.