misterd said:
Simply untrue. As a relatively early DVD adopter (1998), I remember when many new releases were $30 for a bare bones disc.
|
I think you may have misunderstood his post. I think he was saying that Blu-Ray is significantly cheaper than it's alternative, DVD, as of the present time.
DVD also has the advantage of a way bigger install base, and people also need to get an HDTV to appreciate what Blu-Ray has to offer. Combine that with the fact that DVDs are way cheaper, and I think Blu-Ray has quite a battle it's been waging.








