Is Sony's PS3 losing the console wars to the Xbox and Wii?

[Cueil]

Zlejedi said:

kowenicki said:
There has always been this contradiction.

arguement 1 "360 is actually more expensive because of the add-ons required"

arguement 2 "360 only sells more because it is so cheap!"

slight contradiction there.

 

Not really both are true depending on how you use it:

If you want just gaming and no net arcade is cheaper.

If you want full package with wi-fi, live and hd total cost of ownership is similar.

If you want full package as above + separate blue ray player then ps3 is seriously cheaper.

 

But typical consumer won't even know about points 2 and 3 as MS is very good at hiding additional costs.

 

 

 

only one is true... is a car any less a car because it doesn't have 8 way power seats and a moon roof?  No... those are luxuries that are not nessarry... saying that I need a wireless addapter and all this other shit is retarded... for those who want a wireless adapter it is there and for those who don't that is what that RJ45 port is there for.  The system is cheaper don't think tacking on accessories that are optional one one system, but shoved down the mouth's of  people on the other system even matter to anyone except sony fanboys.