Sullla said:
Your first paragraph is simply incorrect. SNES/Genesis had the market split almost exactly 50/50. But I don't recall massive losses among third parties in that period... I also don't buy that the Wii and PS360 are "largely incompatible" markets. What about Guitar Hero, and other such games? Anything genuinely mainstream (i.e. not targeted specifically to 15-25 yr. men) has done well on all three platforms. This just sounds like excuses to me. I hope you don't seriously believe that the majority of the Wii's audience would have simply bought 360s instead. |
Guitar hero is the exception, not the rule. Other games have required seperate development efforts for both the Wii and HD versions. Seperate advertising efforts too. Btw why would I make excuses? What exactly do I have to excuse?
The publishers would be better off if there was one platform with dominance. It doesn't matter which way it goes, they still would be better off. Btw the games market wouldn't have shrunk even if Nintendo ceased to exist at the end of the last generation. The PS2 managed to increase the market size over the PS1 inspite of Nintendos weakness.It just wouldn't have grown as much. It wouldn't be the size it is now, but it wouldn't have shrunk from last generation to this generation. Infact with a similar platform between the PS3 and Xbox 360 it would have grown for other entirely seperate reasons.
And yes, I believe that the majority of the Wiis audience would have bought a PS3 or Xbox 360 eventually. Remember a majority only has to be 50.1%.
Tease.








