megaman79 said:
Ok, b4 we start this, my fav. film is 2001 and kubrick, hitckcock and scorcese were robbed (the latter coz it took so long 2 get an oscar) But what your saying is that 1 game that has generated so much interest and popularity and is certainly the most unique experience, doesn't deserve to be called the best of the year. Why not? If you look at my other comments what i have suddenly come to terms with is that in reality Miyamoto has embarressed us all with his diverse and unique variation in videogames yet again this year. He started this with Wii Sports and, unlike hollywood and that predictable analogy of bad movies sell thing they always say, to me it seems Wii Fit is anything but. Yes its different, yes its labelled as something that isn't a game. As i write this im smirking due to that classic misunderstood artistic genious label, not that he isn't appreciated, but that he isn't acknowledged the way he probably should be for going against the grain. That is a true artist, that should be the game of the year. Irrelevent how much money it makes.
|
You mentioned Scorcese. You lose.
Let me guess, you're young. The directors you listed won one Oscar for special effects (right around the time the nomination was created), one other never won one and the latest won one for "just being there and not sucking".
The key to all of them? They never created a movie that appealed to the masses in a powerful way. Say it as you will but all of them catered to the "hardcore" demographic" you currently reside within and you appreciate them for it.

Or check out my new webcomic: http://selfcentent.com/







