Solidar said:
Um, Sony would make more money off Blu-ray because all the companies that want to make Blu-ray products, hardware AND software, have to pay royalties to Sony. |
Sony isn't the only company in the bluray coalition so they would only get some fraction of the royalties. As for profits, the PS3 has dug a huge hole in Sony's ledgerbook. Prior to 2004 when PSP costs began, Sony made around $660 million a year on video games. Starting in 2005 when PS3 costs kicked in Sony has made (in millions$) 404, 75, -1,969, and is aiming for close to -1,000 this year. Adding those together means Sony has lost about $5 billion in potential profit from the PS3 already. Until profit returns to more normal $660 million range Sony will continue to fall behind. Is bluray going to bring in $6 billion (to account for future losses) alone? I very much doubt it. That's not to even mention lost return on investment Sony could have gotten from their video game division profits that will end up totalling in the billions. I got the numbers from NeoGAF last night by the way.
Sony would have been much better off making the PS3 a poor man's HD system that still looked better than the Wii on SD and selling bluray seperately on its own merits. I've thought that from the moment we heard the PS3 would cost at least $500.
As for Hus, assuming that is the same Hus, he's been banned many a time before.