The Days of Just Assuming that the Wii Version is Inferior are OVER!

[MaxwellGT2000]

outlawauron said:

Grampy said:

theprof00 said:

This is what you don't understand. PC has the hacking community, PC has system requirements.
Consoles, have almost no cheaters, have a more difficult aiming ability (and therefore a steeper learning curve, allowing for good gamers to reach high scores fairly quickly),
have no system requirements.

BTW maxwell, where in the OP did it mention that quote?

 

 Oh wow, that is truely a novel concept to me. To praise an inferior aiming system because it actually steepens the learning curve. You have just become my new poster child for a previous posting about the social divide among gamers.

http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=51805&page=1

I hope I can quote you, because it alone would make me want to take the OP and rewrite it as an article for a gaming journal. That statement practically defines hte "warrior" demographic.

 

I'm in the boat that prefers dual analog to keyboard but for different reasons. I, first of all, just hate keyboard and mouse controls. I try to stay away for PC shooters. And about the speed, I don't think it's very realistic for a soldier with combat armor and gun to pirouette 180 degrees like a ballerina on command. Nothing to do with learning curve.

 

It's not really about the turning speed (as CoD does take this into account bigger weapons = slower to move around with and to turn with) but also how easy it is to get pixel perfect controls, meaning it's rather clunky and can be off a bit on controller while PC and Wii controls it's more about reaction time, you see it you point, you shoot, more realistic then aiming the recticle with a joystick being off by a little bit and readjusting to make sure you shoot them in the head, etc.