windbane said:
Idiocy of reviewers? Odd, I didn't like MP. Galaxy was good, but so is GTA IV. Galaxy is also a rent, GTA IV has multiplayer. Crysis didn't get perfect reviews because the game isn't perfect. It gets too linear towards the end. It was a great game, though, without the graphics being on the highest settings. |
Past the first few part of the game Crysis was a very run of the mill FPS, not even good. GTAIV has multiplayer, but it's nowhere even close when matched up to other multiplayer titles, its main draw is the free sand-box evironment which, to me, felt a lot weaker than San Andreas. On the other hand MP is the pinnacle of its genre, which it more or less defined single-handedly, I don't feel that even Galaxy should be considered better than it but meh, like I said, idiocy of bandwagon reviewers.
Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."
HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374
Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420
gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835