konnichiwa on 23 August 2007
| stof said: Konnichiwa... How the hell did you make your post go all funny like that? |
I don't know X_X. And the funny fact is if I quote someone I see very strange things X_X. Something like: Cellpadding = 2 bbbb fff cell spacing 1 td > . @ Ceres, You have a point but in fact who bought a handheld for the Visuals? If you go for visuals you buy a PC or a console right? Are their reviewers who compare DS games to PSP games? But with the PS2-GC-Xbox they were always comparing the games and saying that GC haves better hardware and Xbox have better hardware. Xbox games looked better than PS2 games. I mean who cares, I really don't care that an game looked better on Xbox but reviewers were saying that a lot. They will always do that and Nintendo went the way for gameplay and not for the visuals. Do you think this* is fair. Example: * They gave MP3 for the visuals 9.5 and they give Halo 3 for the visuals 9.2 when Halo 3 looks better than MP3. The only reason they gave MP3 more than Halo 3 is because MP3 use almost whole the power of the Wii and Halo 3 not of the X360. Sounds fair? Sorry for probably hard understanding English I have some problems with making a post.
