IGN is confusing me right now.

[SaviorX]

I know they don't rate games by average, but look at this:

Tak and the Guardians of Gross

7.0	Presentation The game's art design is original and, for the most part, highly amusing. The user interface is streamlined and simple, perfect for gamers of all ages.
6.0	Graphics There are a few epic moments where the scale of the "Grosstrosities" is shown off, but aside from these brief snippets the game's graphical engine is pretty bland.
6.0	Sound Voice over work is top-notch and the music isn't half bad, either. Tak's constant commentary can get a bit obnoxious, but at least he stays humorous throughout.
6.5	Gameplay Too streamlined for its own good. Combat and platforming can sometimes turn into a tedious errand.
6.0	Lasting Appeal The story will take three or four hours to beat and the multiplayer doesn't add a whole lot outside of another marketing bullet point on the back of the box. There
6.6 Passable	OVERALL

 

Rygar: The Battle of Argus

6.0	Presentation No widescreen support, ugly character models, and painful dialogue. The extra Gladiator Mode is nice, though, and waggle controls don't get in the way of the action.
7.0	Graphics A lot of the environments still look good, with pretty reflections on many surfaces. The characters have not aged well, though.
8.5	Sound The orchestral score is fantastic, but the voice actors struggle with the cheesy dialogue.
5.5	Gameplay This is a six-year old game, and it feels like it. The standard action and light exploration don't offer anything new. Plus, some awkward controls and camera problems get in the way.
6.5	Lasting Appeal Gladiator Mode is an arcade-style beat 'em up that encourages players to keep trying to get better scores.
6.1 Passable	OVERALL (out of 10 / not an average)

 

Anybody got some explanations?