pearljammer said:
Khuutra said:
pearljammer said:
Khuutra said:
pearljammer said:
Wetcoaster said:
MANUELF said:
Because they want more FPS and sports games |
That's the only thing I can think of.
They don't have guns! They suck!
HARDCORE FTW!!!! ZOMG!!
|
Huh? I care just as little about FPS/TPS as I do about Mario. As for Zelda, I'd be very pleased with another Phantom Hourglass type game, but I could care less about the series since Ocarina of Time (Although I did enjoy WindWaker)
|
Why? Every Zelda since then has been better.
Especially Majora's Mask, probably.
|
I was always of the mind that LttP was by far the best in the series. Actually, I would say that LttP is damn near the best game ever. Unlike Mario, I didn't like its transition to 3D. Not that I think all the Zelda's since have been bad, it's just bitterness on my part.
|
But
But that doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the sequels as compared to that of Ocarina of Time
|
No, you're right. I apologize if my post read the wrong way. What I meant to say was simply that I haven't enjoyed the series much beginning with OoT, but by no means do I think they're not great games. Zelda games have always been the pinnacle of quality, I just much rather prefer the LttP/PH style and am somewhat bitter of the transition to 3d - much like those who haven't found Final Fantasy the same since VI.
|
I think the jumps to 3-D were great for both Mario and Zelda, but I never want them to fully replace the 2-D franchises. I'm glad they keep 2-D Mario, 2-D Zelda, 3-D Mario, and 3-D Zelda alive, because they're all separate franchises in my mind. But I'm definitely in the "Last good FF was VI" camp. Endless FMV cutscenes killed RPGs for me.
