Funny that 360 owners who buy the system because it's cheap end up having $60 to buy every game at launch but ps3 owners who paid $600 for the system don't buy games because they're broke? A real conundrum...
i really think it's diversity folks PS3 = PS2 with a MUCH SMALLER userbase. Thats it's real problem this gen. PS2 had lots of million sellers because of it's sheer userbase, same with ps1. People say that gamers bought ps1 because of ff7 and point to other games as sole reasons for the ps2 and ps1's successes. I call BS. FF7 only sold 9mil relative to ps1s 100+mil userbase. If every ff7 purchaser bought a brand new ps1 because of the game, it's still barely 10%. On the other hand, the halo franchise has proven to be a consistent system seller for the xbox brand.
"Dr. Tenma, according to you, lives are equal. That's why I live today. But you must have realised it by now...the only thing people are equal in is death"---Johann Liebert (MONSTER)
"WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives"---Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler
