radha said:
This here is the rason i wonder if they had a plan because if the ps3 had sold like the wii, but with no software moving, that would have meant bigger losses, becasue the dev cant do magic they have to learn how to use the tecnology and look at how long sony is taking to release KZ2, makes me wonder if the original plan was to sell low this entire gen?
@ theprof00
brandname: the ps3 is hurting the PS brand because it ha under perform in every aspect that was adversiced, no sells lead, no tecnology lead, no software sell lead, no network lead and no innovation lead.
blu ray: this only matters to people with hdtv and the ps3 is not an insentive to buy an HDTV, and plus the ps3 is not pushing blu ray anymore, blu ray is keeping sells a float and that was not the original plan Fanbase: they reduced the fan base with the price.
Cell chip: overal system performance retric is not sony promised so the cell looks less powerfull thanks to all the systems bottle necks.
Home theater: console need to be of bread appeal HD is not currently of bread appeal, the ps3 is a gaming console, that is what most see a gamin console. |
radha, this is only showing your bias here. I don't know why you are arguing with me when you asked a question in th OP and I am answering you.
I am taking the perspective of Sony before the release of the PS3 and you are taking the viewpoint of a gamer 2 years after the introduction of the PS3. I am taking my viewpoint because of the way you phrased your question "What was Sony thinking?".
I'm also going to forgive your english, but man, try harder.









