The 3rd Party Balance Sheet of Terror

[Cueil]

Million said:

Cueil said:

Million said:

But Sony still compensates it's lack of 3rd party titles with 1st part offerings , comparing 3rd party titles alone doesn't paint a complete picture.

 

That's not what this thread is about so why do you and others keep harping about it.

 

Alright tell me this , what solid/useful conclusion can we come to by.

A.Comparing 3rd party exclsuvies alone

B. Not including Multiplatform games which make up the bulk of the libary

C. Excluding the Wii

 

 

Because those things are not what this thread is about... derailing a thread is a bannable offense as well... please if you're not going to contribute anything then just don't post on here anymore.  The Wii isn't included because it's so far ahead that it's secured number one and multiplatforms are not exclusives and even if he added them most of them sell better on the 360.  Generally 1st/2nd party will only keep you afloat and that's about it... even Nintendo  who's 1st party is alot better then Sony's can't push their sales much past the floating point.

He who wins the 3rd party race wins war... NES did it as did the SNES eventually... the PS and PS2 did it and the 360 will do it this time... The Wii is on it's own... I still have trouble understanding why so many people buy the system.