WSJ: Democracy loses if Prop. 8 is overturned.

[Grey Acumen]

Ah, actually I never intended to imply that thinking about those points would change their views from what they are, but I do think that if they thought of those views earlier before it became an issue or as it started to become an issue, that the issue might have been less likely to come up or not as severe.

I honestly don't believe there is a genetic predisposition towards homosexuality, I think most of it is.... not so much learned, but influenced by our experiences as we develop, and the only part any genetic predisposition plays is how those influences are handled.
This isn't really something you can test accurately though, so I'm not going to try to say that it's factual, but I'm also not going to accept if someone says that the opposite has been proven. The amount of data that can be held back by people is far too debilitating to get an accurate analysis of the issue, and the sheer number of variables that may or may not influence the issue is again debilitating.

Also, thinking is hardly limited to the primate family. Communication and tool use has been found in Elephants(their communication is actually subsonic, and there are apparently elephants that paint or use sticks for backscratching and the like. there are also aquatic mammals, as well as many other pack animals.

Either way though, my main issue is that I have no problem with a person who is homosexual, such that a man is having a relationship with another man or a woman with another woman. My only issue is that I do not consider homosexual intercourse to be natural (refer back to my "if everyone was straight/gay" point) and I do not believe it should be treated as such.
However, even with not accepting homosexual intercourse as being acceptable, I'm not saying they need to be taken out and punished for it, simply that it should not be billed as equivalent to heterosexual intercourse.