Rath on 26 November 2008
I'm for using two at once. The Sources idea as the main review score, so as to give the reviewers actual proper opinion on the game and a review score out of a hundred in parentheses so as to allow the possibility of being placed on aggregations.
The Sources idea is definitely the best way to show an actual verdict as the numerical system alone is terribly inconsistent at best and utterly useless at worst.
