By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MontanaHatchet on 19 November 2008
Edit Thread
Phoenix_Wiight said:
MontanaHatchet said:
Phoenix_Wiight said:
MontanaHatchet said:
I don't mean to be rude, but the PS3 and 360 are getting dozens of games in the 80% and 90% range, while the Wii gets a couple of games in the 70% range? I reiterate that I'm not trying to be rude or troll. No one disputes the quality of 90+ Wii games like Super Smash Bros., Zelda, or Galaxy. But these games don't seem that great. Hell, with a score like that, Sonic Unleashed actually seems to be a huge disappointment.

 

Wii's AAA titles > PS3/360's AAA titles.

also, IMO, half the crap that gets 80s and 90s on the PS3/360  should get 60s and 70s, and half the stuff on the Wii that gets 60s and 70s should get 80s and 90s. unfair, baised websites and reviewers...

So what should the Wii titles in the 80 and 90 score range get? 100-110% scores? There is no logic in this. Just random website hate.

 

its not random website hate. late me just take gamespot for example.

Mario Galaxy- 9.5 - great.

Twilight Princess- 8.8 - uhh...

Metroid Prime 3 - 8.5 - uhhhh....

Mario Kart Wii- 8.5 - ok, this is ridiculous

Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn - 6.0 - ok, wtf?

Wario Land: Shake it- 7.5 - ....

I have to leave soon, but I'm going to make a thread with this later... but let me just say this.

If TP, MP3, MKWii, etc etc were on any other console, they would get higher ratings. Its biased. You can't tell me that Bioshock was better than TP, MP3 or MKWii, cause it wasn't. You can't tell me GTAIV was one of the most amazing games ever and was a 10/10, cause it wasn't. Fire Emblem, they gave that a 6, and they gave the one before than at 8.5. I find it funny because every Fire Emblem fan thought that game was better in every single aspect, as did I, and should of ATLEAST got a 9.0/10.0

 

 

Isn't Gamespot one of the worst sites for reviews anyways? They had a huge fiasco that I'm sure we all remember. They gave Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3 and Chrono Cross a 10 (THPS3 is a great game, but not 10 worthy). They give games completely random scores that are usually not representative of the average (Ratchet & Clank gets a 7.5 and Fire Emblem gets a 6 while Warioware gets a 9?). I have no idea what goes on in the minds of Gamespot, and I certainly never go to the site. It's not like they haven't given unusually low scores to games on the PS3 or 360 before.

By the way, I can tell you that Bioshock is better than the games you listed. Do I really think that? No. I haven't played Metroid Prime 3 nor can I form an opinion on Mario Kart from the few times I've played it. However, presenting your opinion as fact is not a very good tool to use in an argument. A lot of people consider Bioshock to be a very good game, and just because you believe it isn't doesn't make it true.

As for Grand Theft Auto IV, I don't believe it was deserving of 10s. It was a great game, and I think it should have scored in the low 90s range. And I could easily claim that it was one of the best games ever. How do you know how many games I'm putting in this special category I consider to be "the best?" Isn't "the best" only supposed to be 1? Whatever.