epsilon72 on 19 November 2008
Viper1 said: I've used practically every major browser out there. Top speed is irrelevant. If it renders a page 2/10th's of a second faster yet lags behind in features and customization, what's the point? A better way to rate them is in overall quality. Best: FireFox 3.0.4 (3.1B1) High Quality: Opera 9.62 Google Chrome 0.3.154.9 Mid Quality: Safari 3.2 Konqueror 4.1.3 Low Quality: Netscape Navigator 9 9.0.0.9 Internet Explorer 7.0 (8.0B2) |
lol. Poor konqueror. I like what they're trying to do, but it still needs a lot of work...(i have 4.1.3 also)
I agree that browsers should be rated on their featureset rather than speed. Most of them are fast enough anyways.