| Alby_da_Wolf said: I don't own any PS, One, 2 or 3, but I prefer Sony to overtake MS to avoid any risk that we'd have if MS becomes too powerful. As we saw in the near and far past, both Nintendo and Sony leaderships were easily and suddenly overtrown by daring ang innovating competitors, with MS it could be different, they have a bad record of actions that also extend out of the law (they prefer to pay far too low fines than stop unfair but profitable behaviours) to keep leaderships or, worst, monopolies they manage to obtain. But even without breaking the law, MS is very dangerous, as thanks to its huge cash it can afford to even lose billions to get and keep the leadership. |
Yeah. That's where I stand as well. I don't mind MS being in the market as I did buy their system along with the PS3 this generation. Seeing how the OS and Office business was run in the last 20 years by MS and all of their fair-competition violations, I don't want to see the VG industry fall into the same trap. That's why I usually root for Sony if it's between MS and Sony. If MS doesn't mind being a competitor in the race, that's fine.
"Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Hermann Goering, leading Nazi party member, at the Nuremberg War Crime Trials
Conservatives: Pushing for a small enough government to be a guest in your living room, or even better - your uterus.
