| Griffin said: You guys defending edge have completely lost touch with the world, if you guys think Gears2 is 3 points of better shooter then WaW or R2 then i don't know what to think. And tomb Raider 2 points higher then both of them... Have you guys even played that game, i know i played the demo, and the game was shit from the get go, bad camera with unresponsive controls with graphics which are much worse then WaW or R2. |
Well, I think that the campaigns(only part I, and apparently Edge played) are a lot better in Gears 2/L4D(if you call co-op the campaign) then in R2. Can't speak to World at War, yet.
That said, 3 points is a huge dissparity, even if just going by campaigns. It's like saying, "R2 is half as good as Gears 2."
I don't think that's true.
This review could possibly drop R2 down another point on metacritic, to an 87/100.
To be frank, R2 isn't the best game ever. It kinda flopped according to my expectations.....but calling it a 6/10...well once again, no matter how harsh you review a game, this is rediculious, especially after giving Gears 2 a 9/10(about right). I'd give R2 an 8.5ish level review just on campaign, and this is from a known "PS3 foeboy."
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
