from what i get by reading bozon review he gave it a decent score but he is to harsh when comparing it to xbox360 or even ps3 game. a lot but a lot of sites do the samething when they review a wii port it gets that kind of treatment they always say why did the wii get left out of these particular things or what have u. but people who have wii or people in this site know that it will not have everything that is on the ps3 or xbox360 their disc alone hold more info than the standard dvd disc. and plus their graphics will be better we all know that. it is fair questions to ask the developers but it is not fair to knock the wii version because of it.
"The objective matches and vehicles are out, so you won't get tanks, any of the CTF, Search and Destroy, Headquarters, or War mode, but what is in there runs smooth."
so okay we don't these in the wii version they should be asking the developers why they left these out of the wii version instead of holding these particular things over wii's head. i knew the wii would not have dismemberments shoot they didn't have real fatalities in mortal kombat 1 on snes they even had green blood. they should ask the developers these particular question instead of probably taking points away from wii version.
"Multiplayer is a bit thin on modes, but what's there works very well, and is a blast to play."
so bozon u liked the multiplayer modes right or u going to take points again because it doesn't have all the features on the ps3 and xbox360.
ign should have a blind reviewers that play the game on a particular machine and they can't play it on any other system when giving a review for a particular system. just give me a fair review and tell me if u liked it is it good i could careless if the xbox or ps3 has this and wii version doesn't. but i can see were they are coming from.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
