OXM reviews The Last Remnant

[ZenfoldorVGI]

axumblade said:
It's amazing how someone can find so much joy in their own inflated ego to feel as though their opinion counts for more than just an opinion. Yet they back themselves up with...what is it..wikipedia? If I used Wikipedia as a source for my information, I'd have been torn to pieces. And Shadowrun deserved lower than a 7/10. Of course then again, reviews only matter if they back up an argument. It's funny how one moment something can be so irrelevant and considered bias then become the most influential and crucial piece of information. It's amazing how fanboyism can blind someone to other peoples simple opinions.

You're just pissed because you think I'm arrogant.

I believe that fanboys would use this review source as toilet paper had they given the game a 10/10. They would have said "lets wait for IGN" just like they did with Fable 2. I believe that instead, when a game scores low, they would give the magazine credibility.

After I made that point, a poster told me "Oh well, if the game was a 7/10 from OXM, then it must be REALLY bad because OXM was biased."

I then made a second point, which was that OXM isn't necessarily biased towards Microsoft. The point used examples from a wikipedia posting. However, that point is rife with at least 2 undeniable facts.

The truth is, I like OXM, however, I will point out hipocrasy when I see it. I'm not saying anything positive or negative about TLR, instead, I'm predicting fanboy behaviour. It's obviously angered a lot of fanboys.

 

So, now that you understand, you can stop referring to me in a passive-agressive manner. If you wanna "show me up" you can start by posting valid arguments, instead of frusterated insults.