Actually, the article agress with me:
Resistance 2 gives PS3 devs a blueprint for online play
That said, the single player campaign of Resistance 2 is a somewhat run-of-the-mill experience. It has some memorable, edge-of-your-seat moments—and a fair amount of bonus content in terms of unlockables, trophies, cheats, and hidden intel documents to find—but these are countered with some pretty boring corridor sections and periods of relative inactivity. You'll get your money's worth in the roughly ten hours of solid action, but there is very little you haven't seen before, aside from some epic encounters late in the game.
You heard it from this article. Resistance 2's campaign sucks, is mediocre, run-of-the-mill, whatever you want to call it. It might be better than Gears 2 because of multiplayer, but that's it.
According to this article that is.
Remember that when you lend it credibility.
I'm glad the OP could quote them out of context though, in his title.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.







