I mean it's kind of an odd question because the very nature of the system depends on it's prices. Meaning you can't simply compare these packages without factoring in their real prices. For example ps3 would sell huge at 200 dollars, but the bigger the ps3 became at 200 bucks the more trouble Sony would be in because at 200 dollars they'd be losing so much money on every system that regardless of steep royalties or not they'd never recover. But regardless I think I understand your hypothetical scenario, how would systems sell if price wasn't an issue? I know I'd own all three systems. Many people would simply own all three. Think about it if you could get all three systems for the price of one ps3 who wouldn't? I think people would buy the ps3 simply to have a cheap blu-ray player. But again my point stands comparing systems without factoring in real price is like comparing systems without their components. Like what is ps3 didn't have blu-ray, or Nintendo didn't have is the Wii-mote.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
