drpunk said:
Sorry. You blamed me for trolling so I tried to justify my stance. If you don't want to answer the points then I'll just remain in my stance. Your worst points were for PS3, yet you think it's the best. There's a name for that, isn't there? |
erm I think I may have to spell it out. The console is good, the way they market it, hype what it can do and what they bringing forward for it is bad. It is commonsense and logic to be able to differentiate between the console and things around it.
Take last gen for example.
The dreamcast was awesome but it lacked a DVD player and advertising was horrible. The games were awesome, but they lacked ccertain important things to make it successful.
The Xbox was far better then the PS2. It had better graphics, sound, some of the best looking games with awesome gameplay were on the xbox (e.g Chronicles of Riddick, Ninja Gaiden, Otogi) and it had a hard drive where you could listen to custom soundtracks. Yet, due to issues around the console, the PS2 did better.
This gen, the PS3 IMO is a better console, but due to problems (partially they may have themselves to blame), they are 3rd this gen. Does it makes sense now?







