Fallout 3: Why I don't recomend it...

[vlad321]

Torillian said:

vlad321 said:

Snarf Barf said:

Kyros said:

but here's the thing everything looks like it's from the 1950's.

Sigh, should I try to explain Fallout to the young? Naah nevermind.

 

No need to explain anything I think it's a stupid concept: "In the future everything looks like the past"..................... F that.

 

That right there is major lulz. This is coming from a person with a console which has a game with friken walking burlap sacks? Just lawl.

So....he can't hate the idea of being in the 1950's in the future because of the existence of LBP?  Ignoring whether or not he owns it, the game is on the console he owns and therefore he has no right to complain about another game's ridiculousness?  Wow....that might be the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

 

 

 

Yes, that's exactly what Im saying. If he can't accept a plausible setting of the 1950s (there are signs of some really advanced tech later on) in an alternate future/past where a threat of a nuclear attack is hanging over people's heads all the time and didn't disappear with Russia, how can he accept a walking potato sack? Not seeing why the game has signs of the 50s/60s has to be one of the dumbest things I've heard.