| chapset said: i don't know how many peoples gears 2 can hold on multi player but am pretty sure it won't be near the 60 (insane) peoples that R2 offer, there's even a 8 player coop and since for me the more the merrier i think R2 will be the new benchmark and also graphically gears doesn't look so good compared to crysis and crysis is getting old |
Well, they are two different genres and "60 man multiplayer" is a bullet point that apparently isn't as good as it sounds, which is saying a lot because you should realize it sounds like an un-fun clusterf%$k. There in no reason, ever, that so many people need to be on the same map. Multiplayer is about balance, not consistant and repetitious death, with no skill involved, trying to run past 30 enemy guns in a camped position.
Now, yes, I'm making an assumption about R2, but in reality...how is "as many people as we can fit on the screen" a good thing for multiplayer, instead of a bad thing? That idea was poorly concieved.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
