Graphics nutters please enter.

[thekitchensink]

Garnett said:

thekitchensink said:

Garnett said:

thekitchensink said:
I'd like to remind everyone that Killzone 2 has been in development since 2005, while Gears 2 probably started in mid '07. So the fact that we can even compare them (even if KZ eventually wins out, which I think it does), speaks to the power of BOTh systems.

Also, I don't know if anyone read the OP without their fanboy goggles on, but he clearly said, "But they are so close that really there is no definitive answer."

 

Too Human 10 years in development that means best graphics ever Confirmed?

 

Oh wait your logic is stupid..

 

Yeah, a game originally in development for the PS1 backs up your argument perfectly.

 

Killzone 2 has been in development since a year before the PS3's launch. Gears 2 has been in development since 2007. Case closed.

Also, did you notice how I admitted that KZ2 looks better? Of course you didn't.

Dev time =/ Better graphics...Dev time does NOT Mean better graphics,if that were true then why so many PS3 games get delayed and look worse than 360 games?

and Too Human was built from the ground up for 360...And who cares if KZ2 was in development before Gears of war 2?

Does that make it better graphics i think not,Besides there is no way to claim "best graphics"

IMO

Texture-Gears

Lighting/Shadow-KZ2

Effects -KZ2 (The dust looks amazing!!!)

So I guess KZ2 wins by 1 point.

 

I agree.

Now, tell me with a straight face that if Gears 2 had two more years development time (still less than Killzone's), that it would not look much better.