By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
grandmaster192 said:
Legend11 said:
I'm not sure about you but I'm unable to time travel into the future so for me it's more of the here and now for games, why would anyone want to simply sit around in 2007 and wait for games coming in 2008 or 2009? And you never answered my question, please count up the number of rpgs the 360 has now and will have in the next few months and compare that to the PS3.

Buying a next-gen console based on whats out now would be foolish, considering that all 3 consoles have very small libraries. Keep in mind that Blue Dragon, Lost Odysse and Eternal Sonata arn't out yet, so if you want a console for RPG's right now the PS3 has just as many as the 360. Why would you want me to make a list of games that are coming out in the future, yet claim that it's all about whats out now? That doesn't make sense to me. What exactly do you mean by "next few month"? 2 months, 10 month, 4 month?


I really don't understand that mindset that some Playstation gamers seem to have.  I mean when I bought a 360 it was because it had games available that I wanted to play like Oblivion and Gears of War.  But many PS3 fans talk about games a year or two away and it always makes me wonder why they simply don't hold off buying a system and get some extra price cuts if they're waiting for games a year or two away.

It reminds me of a Playstation fan I used to work with.  He hated shooters and always put down the Xbox because of them.  Then when the PS3 came out guess which game he got for it...  Resistance because it was the only game he could find for it that was remotely interesting to him.  After he finished that he ended up playing FF12 and other PS2 games dispite the fact he could have easily played those the system he already had.