Strategyking92 said:
Loud_Hot_White_Box said:
mrstickball said:
One could always go with 80%+ rated games:
X360: 110
PS3: 58
Wii: 20
Any way you cut it, it's always like that. |
No, I've seen people do it multiple ways, like highly rated games as a percentage of overall games, that has PS3 on top.
Any way you cut it, XBLA games pad the raw numbers of high scoring AND low scoring games for 360. They are a bonus to owning the system, certainly, but we all know that a smooth mini game that happens to work well and gets an 80 or 90 is NOT equivalent to a Gears or a Bioshock (a big disc-based game) for 360. Thus, it doesn't make complete sense to use them to pad high-score numbers.
Plus, I think the numbers are well in line between the systems given the longer life of 360 and -- undeniably -- the fact that early 360 games got higher scores just because of the "wow" factor of a new HD console.
|
but here is what you forget: sony has their own download service. Not so much padding now is there?
And that second bit... it wasn't just the wow power, the games were actually damn good, tons better than when the wii & ps3 launched, and why more launch 360 games are highly rated.
|
No, not as much padding. Else the numbers of high scores would be higher. And they wouldn't count as much as highly rated full games, in my opinion. That's what I said.
Re: early reviews/lineups. Ok, the wow factor is ADDED to 360's early lineup, whatever merits it intrinsically had. I'm cool with that. That's what I meant anyway.
