OMG! Fanboys are so lame (proof by Metacritic)

[ZenfoldorVGI]

Shoestar said:

Many fans including the "most prominent" x360 loyalists on these forums with several thousands posts to their names have been touting Fable II to be the RPG of the year. Clearly, it is not. Obviously, they have failed to deliver.

As the situation unravelled itself, It became increasingly clear with the release of the LBP and Fable demos, which games would be getting the better reviews.

That's an ignorant statement, topic, and poster, for many, many reasons. You sir, fail. It's gonna take a bit of writing to explain why this is topic itself is "lame."

The only thing that is clear and obvious is your ignorance.

Let me lay out my argument for why you have made many ignorant assumptions and judgements:

A. You have no proof 360 "fanboys" sabatoged your game. We both may think it's obvious, but in reality, it is unprovable, and it isn't obvious at all. You've "jumped to conclusions." Ignorant people jump to conclusions, sir. Others could just as easily assume that PS3 fans might think LBP is for kids, and thus rate it low. I bet Nintendogs, would have a similar result in our new review culture. Those are also examples of assumptions.

B. You've lain out your opinion as unbiased and generally accepted, when it's not. Most people, like myself, obviously knew from the start(hint: before the demos came out, heh) that LBP was going to get a higher review that Fable. You even said it was "unsurprising" in your post. Yet you've chastised Fable. Just because one game rated 90+ on metacritic and another did not, doesn't mean one "Obviously didn't deliver." Assuming so, is ignorance. You said that you loved the first game, though it got lower reviews. Did it also obviously "fail to deliver?" Most would say F1 did fail to deliver, yet Fable 2 was far less hyped, expectations wise, than Fable 1, and yet Fable 2 delivered a far better game. Does 1 point out of 100 obviously and clearly determine a generally accepted pass or fail test? No. Also, does metacritic "obviously" determine anything, like GotY? I wasn't aware Metacritic had a RPG of the year award?

B2. Also, you've mentioned how the games are uncomparable due to their genres, yet you do eventually compare them in your chastizing Fable 2 flame, claiming that Fable 2 "Clearly and obviously isn't rpg of the year, and failed to deliver." At best trolling, at worst flamebait.

C. Less than 4 hours ago, Fable 2 had a 90 rating on Metacritic. Did this so called "fanboyism reducing the user score for LBP" happen in the last 4 hours, since the GiantBomb 4/5 review was posted?

D. How is this topic even Fable 2 related? If what you ignorantly assumed was true, then Fable 2 would have very little to do with Fanboys hating LBP. The Fable 2 insult is just a slight against 360 fans, because you're pissed at them, because you, assume, they shorted your game in the user ratings. It's much more likely that a single person ruined your userrating, via an IP scrambler. He could be a Wii fanboy for all you know. Again, your Fable 2 relation doesn't hold water.

E. Games don't "fail to deliver" because they average a 9/10. Especially when the vast majority of Fable 2 fans on this forum, and Molyneux himself, said the game was about a 9/10. Actually most of the fanboys I know guess the average score from 8.5-9/10. Of course, this is anecdotal evidence, from a thread made about a week before Fable 2 launched. To claim "ownage" or "failure" because a game got a point less than it needed to score in the AAA range, is an oversimplification. However generally accepted though it might be, can't you think deeper than that? Flaming a game as a failure, when it got reviews like Fable 2 got, is a failure in and of itself, of intelligent thought. It's also trolling. It's an opinion that is neither generally accepted, or valid.

F. There is no Fable II demo within the timeframes you've specified. You see how your ignorance is starting to become a provable reality?

G. I don't think 360 fans are too upset or dissapointed with Fable 2 reviews....lol. That's one huge ignorant assumption you've made. To assume that 360 owners, or anyone, are upset by yourflames, and that WKC fans should beware your wit...well you think an awefully lot of yourself. Some guy running a 0/10 bot got to you harder than you could get to the weakest poster on these forums. Whatever forum you are accustomed to posting on, it needs someone like me. A real flamer. This whole "I go by opinions and pretend they are generally accepted in order to flame and further my epeen" stuff is babycakes, bro. I know what you're trying to do, but it's like trying to watch a child drive an 18-wheeler.

H. What makes you ignorant are your many presumptions.

I. What makes you disgusting is your need to flame Fable 2, because you are pissed off that LBP got flamed by the user-bot.

J. What makes you a hypocrite is when you said you hate fanboys.

I think a lot of myself too. What do you think of me?