When I say I agree with your conclusion, but not necessarily the logic behind it. I am not necessarily arguing that your logic is flawed. I simply mean that I am not going to comment on that logic. Which I did not. Instead I presented the logic by which I reach the same conclusion in much the same way that a certain math problem can be solved in numerous ways. You sight specific game releases. I sight economic pressures and social consequences. There is not very much in the overlap as it were.