LOL MATURE said:
selnor said:
LOL MATURE said:
NNN2004 said:
LOL MATURE said:
And when you get a ps3 and play uncharted you will scratch your head and wonder why it isn't 90+ on metacritic.
|
lol i already have  .. & i have uncharted also & if u dont belive me go check my name on VGchartz trophy league ... & still the 360 have better line of games & superp graphics because i test both and u dont ....... yah got ya  .
|
then you see how generalizing with opinions is a stupid thing to do.
NHL '09 is not 90+ title on the 360. Case closed. Look at the only reviewers that scored both games and you will see they actually scored ps3 game higher.
Metacritic is flawed.
|
LOL Mature. Massive fail going on with your sig and the use of metacritic. Your point about Metacritic being flawed is right but in favour of PS3 not against.
First off your sig says NHL 360 90% - WRONG it's 89% from the critics (you seem to be going off users which is biased)
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/nhl09?q=nhl%2009
http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/ps3/nhl09?q=nhl%2009
Also PS3 has had 21 reviews and 360 had 32. That would make it way harder for 360 to get high score. It has far more chance of hitting lower scores as it had an extra 11 reviews.
I love the way you try to make a point in your sig and get it all wrong.
Metacritic for NHL 09 is as follows.
PS3 - 89% 21 reviews
360 89% 32 reviews
|
considering my post is about someones sig quoting gamerankings (and i even made a thread about it)... you would be correct if it were about metacritic. when i say metacritic is flawed I mean anytype of site similiar to it.
|
Well that does explain. Gamerankings have been known to tweak for fanboyism. But like I said Metacritics is harder on almost all games for 360 to maintain a higher score because the game has to impress more reviewers to stay above the 90 average. So PS3 has an advantage and still losses out.
