Why not 360?

[EdGuila]

vlad321 said:

bobobologna said:

Everstar said:

vlad321 said:
Oh the other thing is that in this day and age it's pathetic that you have to pay to play on-line, unless it's an MMO.

 

45$ a year is that really to much tho?

 

It's basically the cost of an extra game. I'd rather have an extra game than have to pay to play games I already paid for, online. Especially if Microsoft isn't going to provide dedicated servers.

BTW, this is the main reason why my friend's and I went with the PS3.

What he said.

Also, add that 45 a year to your 360 and lo and behold, the Wii is cheaper again.

In Canada it's just under $59 for Live.  Every 360 owner I know has bought a battery pack and a charge cable.  Add those two to the cost of Live and you're approaching the PS3.  The difference is cost gets you many 360 games, BD player, WiFi, REAL and MORE exclusives (not the faux-ones that are for 360 that are for PC) and future proofed for atleast 7 years.  Future proofing looks bad on the 360 part, it runs off DVD and their other system had it's plugged pulled after 4 years in contrasts to Sony's 9 year back to back dynasties.