By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Sales - others UP - View Post

psrock said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
psrock said:
ZenfoldorVGI said:
Endz said:

It's doing poor compared to the Wii, and relatively poor in Others, compared to the PS3.

How is the PS3 doing in America and Japan compared to the Wii. How is it doing compared to the PS2? How is the 360 doing compared to the original Xbox?

Microsoft is focusing on building a brand name. Sony is focused on destroying theirs in the name of short term profit. This mainly entails allowing presumptive 3rd party exclusives go to the 360 on launch, so next gen, Tekken, Final Fantasy, and DMC won't be so presumptive, as Sony brands. It's called "coasting." It's enough to beat the 360 this gen, in Sony's strongest territory, at least, but you'll find as time passes, it won't serve them well. It's what you do when you're not willing to spend money maintaining your brand. You rest on your laurels. Granted, Sony isn't doing this entirely, as they have recently decided to improve focus on first party games, in response to harsh criticism. However, damage has already been done. The 360 has better 3rd party support this generation, and that's never something Sony has had to worry about.

How? the Ps3, wii are very reliable, while the 360 , you know......

MS is competing well and lowering their prices to avoid being passed by, but it will happen eventually. MS is buying its brand name instead of building it.

See, you don't understand the basic concept here. Mistakes happen. Overall strategy remains the same. Microsoft's strategy involves spending large amounts of money to increase its brand. Look at the original Xbox. They didn't spend money on it to make money. They did it to introduce themselves into a marketplace, for the longterm.

They didn't "buy" the strategy. Nobody on a street corner was like, "Hey Microsoft, I got a strategy over here 10 bucks. Beat Sony." No, they formulated a strategy, and the strategy was to spend hellified cheese on the Xbox and the Xbox 360, to please customers and increase brand recognition and marketshare. Yeah, they bought brand recognition and marketshare. Their plan worked well.

Ask yourself this. If Microsoft hadn't made the monumental mistake of RRoD this generation, would it still be doomed to 3rd place? If it fixes that issue next gen, will Sony still be able to coast into second?

Ask your self this, If Sony had release the PS3 at a decent price and released more games instead of promising them, You'd think we will be talking about this right now?

Sony and MS made a lot of mistakes this Gen, If both fixes those problems, Sony will always win.

Btw, the PS3 launch AND 2007 was worst. Come on, they released a $600 console. MS better finsish second.


Wow psrock did some serious pwng with this post lol. But on a true though no one can really understandhow strong brand names are in europe untill you go there. I mean here in the Uk you can sell to products, just let me do an example HDTV both 50inch, both with same tech. both look the same, one costs 600 the other will cost 900 or over a grand, the only difference is one is made by lets say digibit but the other is made by panosonic or sony. guess which one is the expensive one. yh sony/panosonic, now guess what one sells better sony/panosonic. Oh yh and by the just for the lolz i brought some nike trainers the other day that cost more then a 360. and why did i pay so much for then because it had a nik tick on the side.

Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st