By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

@ shio
Me trolling? Honestly? The only thing I heav heard out of you is a variation of this:
"each campaign will be bigger then SC1" and that is your response to EVERY argument people have presented you with.

How is their idea different than say having 10 missions from each race in each game, instead of having 30 per release but for only 1 race race? Why can't they just give us all the 3 races right off the bat? In the end it won't matter how epic the story is, it will still be 90 missions, but at least you'd be able to play all 3 in every release, and just maybe get some really badass intertwining of stories. Just have each release continue from where the last left-off. Pricing should still be $15-25 for each and no more.

twetrm also brought up a very good point. Single-player was your tutorial to multiplayer. If we get to play as only terrans then we have to suffer being destroyed online until we pick up the other races? Bullshit idea.

dgm6780 also brings up a GREAT point. We got 3 of the best games ever conceived in one package for $50 bucks, released at the same time. Why should Blizzard do the exact opposite?



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835