By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
shio said:
BenKenobi88 said:
I think this is a bit of an overreaction.

Maybe they wanted players to be able to buy only the campaigns they wanted to play? If it all adds up to $50, I don't think there's really a reason for complaint, other than the stupidity of buying 3 discs.

So for someone to say they're going to buy the first $15 disc and pirate the rest...that's stupid. You're basically saying you were going to pay $50 for Starcraft II, but since they put it on three separate discs adding up to $50, you decide you'll just pay $15? That logic really doesn't add up.

Unless of course it ends up being more than $50, in which case Blizzard made a boo-boo.

How would more than $50 be a mistake? 2 of the campaigns will be in expansions, just like many PC games do, and each campaign will be bigger than all of SC1's campaigns combined.

 

Considering that the original game you only have a Terrain campaign, it is utterly unfinished. Without a Zerg/Protoss camapign it is not a complete game. Doesn't matter how big they are, it is not a complete Starcraft experience.

 



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835