By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SpartanFX said:
wow I just noticed the weekly gap between PS3 and 360 shruk by 30 K compared to last week


@kirby

you shouldn't make these threads ,,,you should be ashamed that a console half as expensive as a PS3 can only outsell it WW by 40 K per week which that number is shrinking faster than Amy Winehouse visits to the rehabilitation clinics. ;)

 

 I don't get this.

Why should that make anyone ashamed, other than Sony, and Sony fans?

- The console is too expensive to make, Sony loses money, and is unable to outsell the X360, despite having a clear advantage coming into the generation.

- The console with the worse gaming library (of the two), costs twice the price.

 

Then we can draw these conclusions.

1. Sony screwed up

2. You would have to be a moron to buy the Ps3.

 

Now, someone will reply that No, this isn't the case, because with the Ps3 you also get a blu-ray, and you have to buy a HD-DVD for the X360. This means that the X360 really is less value for the money. Of course, this is despite having a worse gaming library, so what this means, is that the X360 costs more overall, or roughly the same.

 

So now, we are in the situation of.

1. X360 sells crappy, as it sells as much as a console that costs twice as much.

2. X360 is really about as expensive as the Ps3, and including RRoD and the price for online, it may be more expensive.

 

Double morale as heck, or am I missing something?

 

Edit:

 

So really, what I see.

3. X360 is doing a good job equalling a console that costs as much. It has a bigger library, but also started with a momentum against it. Console with roughly equal value for the money selling as much seems relatively fair to me.

 

 

 



http://www.vgchartz.com/games/userreviewdisp.php?id=261

That is VGChartz LONGEST review. And it's NOT Cute Kitten DS