By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
shio said:
twesterm said:

And confirmed here that you will in fact have to buy the game 3 times if you want to play all three campaigns.

To put it simply: this is bullshit.  Fuck Blizzard.

I'm sure they could sell each one for $15-20 but I have the funny feeling the first one is going to be sold for $40-50 and then next two 'expansions' will be $15-20 each.

It's like they want people to pirate their game.

Are you an idiot? Think, each campaign will be as big or bigger than SC1's AND factoring how Blizzard is pushing the story-telling in the RTS genre, with adventure and RPG likeness AND non-linearity you will have a campaign that will totally crap on "shitty" stories like Gears of War and Halo 3.

And each of the campaigns will be seperate of each other, it won't ruin your single-player experience or leave it cliff hanging. So tell me, how is changing from 3 small campaigns to 1 Big campaign (as big as all 3) that not only has several innovations like non-linearity, adventure elements and a RPG parts that will help the progression and a far better replay value, be a bad change?

Hey, how about that Halo 3: Recon ehh?? It is going to have a campaign as "awesome" as Halo 3's??? lol

I asked this question before, if each is a complete single-player experience, then how are they gonna make the campaigns mesh together? I loved playing as Kerrigan/Arthas in their previous games and then having to fix all the shit I did from another point of view. Seems like they are throwing all that away now so they can save themselves from cliff hangers.



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835