Katilian said:
Uhh, no, and if you'd read my post you'd understand why. There is another way to define it, copyright infringement. If the law doesn't need to differentiate between the two then why bother with a Copyright Act? Since you suggest there is no other way to define it unless you condone it, I guess many legal systems condone piracy. Edit: And again Morgyn beats me to the punch |
I understand your post completely. If you read my post as well, you'll notice that I'm not focusing on copyright infringment vs. larceny. They are different laws primarily because of the english common law roots of larceny having little in its language to support intellectual property because of the whole issue of "deprivation". IP laws, alothough varying in great degrees worldwide, were put in place to protect property of the mind in the same manner that tangible, physical property is protected. My point is that whether it is larceny or copyright infringment, if the user gains any benefit whatsoever from pirating (and they will get some amount of benefit, even if they play the game for 1 minute and decide they don't like it and delete it) it is still theft. Period. Again, in the eyes of the law, you have "stolen" and are punishable in a court of law. We are splitting hairs here as you well know, but boil it down to the basics and don't overthink it. We all know why IP laws exist...