TWRoO said:
Yes that was my reasoning... but yes, my numbers were not based on anything in the same way as fastyxx just assumed Halo 3 must have more people playing currently because he thinks so.
|
I knew you didn't read the original post, because if you did you'd try and make more sense.
From the original post:
"But I'd much rather have a game that is tweaked monthly and regularly expanded/updated and regularly played for months and months and months after launch than a game that sells more but whose pre user lifespan is limited. It's a better blueprint for the future of gaming. See Burnout Paradise on both PS3 and 360 for a similar good buy for consumers."
Which was the whole point behind the discussion. But you smelled anti-Wii bias because someone didn't bow down before all things Mario, so you got all huffy before you figured out what was going on.
Anyhow. I really don't care. Just haven't had a good back and forth post battle for awhile. No worries, friend.