By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
cwbys21 said:
RolStoppable said:
dougsdad0629 said:
TheBigFatJ said:
RolStoppable said:
Where's F-Zero? Where's Wave Race?

I don't care for the casualized sequels to Mario and Zelda.

Casualized Mario and Zelda?  Galaxy is the best game released this generation and Zelda: Twilight Princess is one of the best Zelda games yet.

 Yeah, I don't get that statement either.  There is nothing casual about either of those games.  2 of the best games I've ever had the pleasure of playing.

I have to work much harder on my popularity.

I don't know if you are being sarcastic or not but Zelda TP was definitely made for idiots.  There are some puzzles that take time to figure out, but they treat you like an idiot by telling you again and again that a blue rupee is worth 5 and they keep telling you how to use bombs whenever you get some more and same with arrows.  And some of the bosses are ridiculously easy.  Like the spider in the second forest temple took I think 4 or 5 hits to kill him.  Stun him with arrows, smash using the scepter that controlls statues, repeat.  It was definately the easiest Zelda I had ever played and I have played a few.

It's been explained a thousand times.  After playing several games in a series, it begins to seem easier and easier.  TP was the easiest Zelda for me, but that had more to do with me already knowing how to think through most puzzles and such than absolute difficulty.  I'm pretty sure it was around the same difficulty as OoT and the others.  Explanations are for people NEW to the game, not you.  I don't see what's wrong with creating a game that's playable by more than people who're loyal to the franchise.  Isn't the goal traditionally to expand the userbase O.o?

Oh, and Rol is sarcastic.  Always.