twesterm on 03 October 2008
| LordTheNightKnight said: The thing was DJ chimed in with a point I had already stated (not as many zombies), one that was irrelevant (circular shadows), and one that was obvious (not looking as good as the 360 version). That's not defending a game. That's attacking BS. I'm not defending the game. I'm calling out people for bashing it for dumb reasons. You have at least something, Onyxmeth. What others are claiming is that the fundamentals magically are tied to being exactly like the 360 version. This is what TV Tropes calls "They changed it, now it sucks". I understand the game would suck, just not for the reasons they claim. |
Attacking the games on looks.
what do you care if someone hates the shadows? I admit it's a silly thing to hate but if that's his gripe about the game let it be his gripe.
Attacking the amount of zombies on screen.
So since you mentioned it in your opening post it's now against the rules to mention it aftwards? Also, is it really a dumb reason to not be too excited about the game since one of the fundamental pillars of the game isn't so much there? I'm not griping it's not exactly like the 360 version, I'm griping that a game about fending off hordes of zombies doesn't have hordes of zombies.
