| Xen said: I was responding to trestres and he said "any game". So I just quoted him. Besides, as you can see, I used multiplats in my reasoning, and not impossible scenarios where something of the same genre but entirely different caliber competes with Mario. @Phendrana: I can't use that argument in any game. I can only use it in sports games that in their own turn boil down to which one delivers the most reality-like experience... as an example, I'll use one from the 6th gen... with Madden games. Remember the best selling console in America then? the PS2. Remember how far apart was the Xbox from the PS2's numbers? I won't bother checking the exact number, but obviously, by overall number, a lot. Now, how have both games sold on both platforms? in the userbase/sales ratio the Xbox has shown that it sells more madden games per console. Why? because it delivers a far more realistic experience, as the XB had far better graphics than the PS2. You might argue with how the tastes of the PS2 and XB gamers are different, but both demographics were similar in age and tastes. I read of that argument, btw. It's not mine, I just agree with John Lucas, who said it first. You might know him from VGC. @dib8rman: Well... those are discussion forums... everything is an opinion here... people can agree on an opinion but it's never a fact. Everything here should be taken in as an opinion, but never as a fact. "IMO's" are unnecessary.
|
The PS2 and XBox Maddens were exactly the same except one looked better. Obviously the one that looks better would be considered the more realistic version when everything else is identical. With the Wii you also have to consider how the controls factor in. Some people would consider them more immersive than graphics. If you prefer the HD version for its graphics that's fine, but please don't insist your opinion is fact.
