By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
darthdevidem01 said:
jcp234 said:
The 360 already has a significant lead over the PS3, but somehow stretching that lead is considered bad?

Maybe my logic is flawed. Regardless of how little the 360 outsells the PS3, it is still outselling the PS3 (and reversing the PS3's ability to diminish the 360's lead)


The 360 has been on the market a year longer while fighting bad publicity (hardware defects which appear to have been remedied for the most part), cultural/preference resistance in Japan and Sony brandy loyalty in Europe.

It is simply mind boggling that some posters can still discredit the recent performance of the 360 and consider it justifiable.

Just wow...

PLEASE.....Just PLEASE don't even link Bad Publicity with 360

We know and even you know what Ps3 went through in 07 & late 06.....bad publicity wise

There was a book written on its failure in Japan for gods sake.....you can't beat that

 

 

No, that's not bad publicity. It's called research on a very interesting topic: how someone goes from total domination and landslide victory to demise.

Before you ask, I do consider Takahashi's extended article on the RROD woes research as well.





Current-gen game collection uploaded on the profile, full of win and good games; also most of my PC games. Lucasfilm Games/LucasArts 1982-2008 (Requiescat In Pace).