Looks like the 360 price cut has had some effect

[Staude]

darthdevidem01 said:

Staude said:

darthdevidem01 said:

Staude said:

spidey_77 said:

Staude said:

spidey_77 said:

DMeisterJ said:

spidey_77 said:

DMeisterJ said:
Yeah, some effect. Almost back to pre-price drop levels in America.

Japanese sales fell hard from last week.

And it's still losing to PS3 in Others.

And the PS3 is still losing WW even though its had $200 cut from its orig price and its the best blu ray player.

Wow.

Still living in 2007 eh?

No, its just that SONY fanboys start attacking the 360 when it drops in price saying how desperate MS is although it hasn't had that big of a drop compared to the PS3. Now they say wait for when PS3 drops to $299. It seems they're always waiting for something.

 

 

that is irrelevent when it's still the most expencive console on the market :p

Actually the 360 is more expensive. 360 pro is $299 + 100 wireless adapter + $100 for two years of online + $200 blu ray player >>>>>>> PS3 40Gig. Its just that MS was smarter and decided to give option to the buyer instead of being forced to buy everything.

 

 

usually i would respond to this but you just pwnd yourself.

 

twice.

 

... in one post.

or your incapable of puting forward an argument towards that point.

In fact it is due that point that PS3 has great percieved value.

 

Fine. First of all he said that the xbox 360 is more expencive due to all it's accessories which is what "we" have been saying all the time. Therefore he just agreed that microsoft offer less value for your money.. and hence he just pwnd himself.

 

Second of all he assumes that everyone getting said console would get all of these ekstra things and that they would automatically go for the most expencive model which is just plain ignorant. Therefore he pwnd himself again. (for instance with the $100 for live. It's funny how everyone's kept claiming xbox 360 was cheaper and that's why you should get it and then when it's ahead for two weeks it's suddenly more expencive then the ps3? Infact his whole post says that it's more expencive but microsoft was smart because it's cheaper. It's like dividing with zero.

 

 

There.

 

I didn't say it was incorrect. I simply said he pwnd himself twice which was why a response would be unnessesary.

 

I'm sorry I misread his & your post....I thought you were posting against the PS3 so I came in to protect it.

 

no worries :p