By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Xen said:
Ronster316 said:
Having played GT 3 and then GT 4 i have to say that they should have called GT 4 GT 3.5, Afterall it looked identical and added like what? 2 or 3 tracks? (I know, lets add a snowy track and call it GT 4, that will shut them up for another 4 years) The problem is that sony fanboys will never acknowledge the fact that there are other racers out there that are just as good or in forza 2's case......... better than GT, GT fans speak like the game is "untouchable"........ Sorry, but that is simply not the case anymore

"The problem Sony fanboys blablablablabla"

First of all, it doesn't seem like you played GT4 too much. It has 3x the content of GT3.

Second, is there a simulation that is in any way close to what the GT series offer? no, I don't see one either...and not Forza 2.

Lastly, you're known to be a Sony hater... so why should anyone listen to you?

 

Oh, So a few new cars and a couple of extra tracks make GT 4 stand out over GT 3 huh , yeah, I dislike sony but the bottom line is that GT 3 is better than GT 4 because GT 4 aside from a few more cars and everyones fave new snowy track brought nothing to the table....................

 

I'll give credit where credits due....... God of war, Metal gear solid ect, But the truth is that Gran turismo has been caught up in terms of great racing games and the only reason you still think its "untouchable" is because its a sony game........

Known sony hater yes, But theres known sony fanboys who hate Microsoft so why should anybody listen to them? Its called an opinion.....................

And lastly you are a stern supporter of Sony and Nintendo and you advise people to boycott Microsoft so why should anyone listen to you either?

I have never prior to today said anything like "why should anyone listen to you"

But today i have made an exception just for you

Let people have an opinion and chill out huh