By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Gnizmo said:
c0rd said:
vlad321 said:

If we go by the ratio of failure/success Valve and Blizzard are currently sitting at 0 while Nintendo is above that, not more than 1 that's for sure, but above that 0. It takes a lot of hard work to constantly make top-nothc innovative games and Nintendo has failed before. Don't get me wrong, I have a Wii as well and my love owards it is second only to my PC, but again I'm just calling it as I see it.

Oh, of course Valve or Blizzard has so few (at the moment, 0) failures - they're much smaller, so they make very few games. Nintendo needs to pump out tons to support their systems, so there are bound to be some bad eggs in the batch. I was only arguing that Nintendo has easily revolutionized the gaming industry scene much as (or more than) Carmack(id) / Newell(Valve).

 You may want to go revisit the early work of Blizzard. Rock and Roll Racing was god awful.

You mean Blackthorne, and the Lost vikings as well? All those 3 games were awesome. Especially the Vikings. That game just pure hilarity.

 



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835